1/ interesting science, but the article is garbage starts out talking about "direct images", but then the images in the article are labelled "simulations", and the text says "... too small and distant to be directly observed". almost all science writing is garbage, sadlyhttps://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/1372536072589225985 …
-
Show this thread
-
2/ > it suggests that they might be the driver of an epic earlier period known as the epoch of reionization epic / epoch, whatever, close enough
4 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
3/ caveats to tweet #1 in this thread: the thing that is claimed to be too small and distant are galaxies, which is not exactly the same as filaments and the final image in the article is not labelled "simulation"
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MorlockP
also (and I mostly agree with you BUT) "epic" is hyperbolic but I don't this the writer meant "epoch" there... rescan it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ngvrnd
the writer used "epic" and "epoch" in the same sentence ... but, yeah, maybe you're right
6:25 AM - 18 Mar 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.