1/ interesting science, but the article is garbage starts out talking about "direct images", but then the images in the article are labelled "simulations", and the text says "... too small and distant to be directly observed". almost all science writing is garbage, sadlyhttps://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/1372536072589225985 …
-
-
5/ 99.999% of political reporting will talk about a new bill or executive order, but not link to it. So you just have to take someone else's word that a bill is "pro woman" or "anti environment" or whatever. harrumph
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if it did (and some does) you'd find the articles paywalled behind Springer-Verlag or some such shit
-
Academic paywalls actively make the population less informed. And none of the money actually goes to funding science. Burn academic publishers to the ground, I say.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.