2/ > it suggests that they might be the driver of an epic earlier period known as the epoch of reionization epic / epoch, whatever, close enough
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ caveats to tweet #1 in this thread: the thing that is claimed to be too small and distant are galaxies, which is not exactly the same as filaments and the final image in the article is not labelled "simulation"
Show this thread -
4/ probably the thing I hate most about pop science writing is that it almost never links to the actual scientific papers, so you can see that stuff is getting mangled in the translation, but you can't read the real stuff, at least not easily (not unique to science writing >
Show this thread -
5/ 99.999% of political reporting will talk about a new bill or executive order, but not link to it. So you just have to take someone else's word that a bill is "pro woman" or "anti environment" or whatever. harrumph
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Most “science communicators” can’t.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was watching someone talk about the death of the universe during the black hole era, and he just casually assumed proton decay.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.