2/ He might want to push back against "Board Member X violated the law by not recusing himself" ... but he can't. He might want to push back against "there were no citizens present" ... but he can't. He might want to push back against "reduces the setbacks"...but he can't.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ So many actual true painful points I've made ... and he can't disagree with any of them, because they're all rock solid true, and supported with THEIR OWN TRANSCRIPTS and REFERENCES TO THE LAW WITH LINKS. So...what does he do?
Show this thread -
4/ He panics and starts a debate on facebook saying that "well, actually, what does 'industrial building' even mean? because, um, if that's steel then that's not a surface that we have the legal ability to because not an aesthetic issue"
Show this thread -
5/ He did try to refute my claim that the planning board debated the proposed change for 1 minute and 45 seconds by saying "we discussed it at length". I provided a link to the video and said that he didn't - unless he meant "in email", and in that case >>>
Show this thread -
6/ ...why is the planning board violating the NH open records law by not releasing their emails?
Show this thread -
7/ I think that some of these !@#-holes are now starting to perceive the noose starting to tighten a bit. Fingers crossed.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
BEGINNING TO THINK THAT TR*MP SHOULD HAVE HIRED MORLOCK TO INVESTIGATE V*TER FRAWD IN 2020 ERECTION
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.