The most non-credible assertion in the SSC thing is the insistence journalists don't think about SSC at all. Ah yes, that must be why the article was revived months after the initial call... That's why journalists were falling over themselves to dissect it and contextualize it.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1366017376202993664 …
-
-
If it's true a rationalwiki person fed them most of the links, this suggests it's the journalists' sources we're specifically living rent free in... but, all of this just makes it worse. There is no enlightened reporter presenting a measured view. It's just laundered gossip.
-
we're in agreement
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.