Superintelligence cannot be contained: Lessons from Computability Theoryhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00913
the dog, using the dog equivalent of Bayesianism, will sort of trust my claim re Newtonian physics after 1 test, and very much trust it after 20 tests. Likewise us and superintelligences. If they have a model of truths we can't even understand, and they make predictions that >
-
-
come true, repeatedly, then that doesn't mean that we should trust them that the model X they speak of is the actual mode of the universe, but we should trust them that they have SOME model X or Y or Z that works.
-
btw, I 100% understand and agree with your core point > I get reluctance to accept there's nothing we can't grasp if explained well, but learning is also constrained by time nope, no reluctant at all I'm not arguing that we can GRASP all truths, merely that many can be proven
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.