-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
20/ I'm not engaging in nihlism. I'm disagreeing with a bad argument, and providing data. https://twitter.com/twkiter/status/1346819265110962178 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Cary Bleasdale
21/ rebuttal, with data!https://twitter.com/Cary_Bleasdale/status/1346820342241783808 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
Cary Bleasdale @Cary_BleasdaleReplying to @Cary_Bleasdale @MorlockPhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40061221?mag=how-the-brownie-camera-made-everyone-a-photographer&seq=8#metadata_info_tab_contents … Page 8 has a 1900 kodak ad targeted at kids and indicating a dollar for the camera and a few cents for film. The first photo booths charged 25¢ for 7 pics, 1925. That's what, a buck apiece in modern terms? About what we pay https://tedium.co/2017/06/01/photo-processing-history-mainstream-phenomenon/amp …1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted silicon age tulpa
22/ semi rebuttal, with semi-data !https://twitter.com/mr_archenemy/status/1346822446595375104 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted silicon age tulpa
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
silicon age tulpa @mr_archenemyReplying to @mr_archenemy @howling_savage @MorlockPi think morlockp's general point is correct, and i share his annoyance at the original tweet, but i think photos were more affordable to more people / popular with more than the rich by the 20s/30s than his overall thread suggests.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
24/ > Stylistic judgement is far from arbitrary uhhh > and to claim otherwise is exactly nihilism. uhhh ^2 https://twitter.com/twkiter/status/1346823228027756546 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.3 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Red Headed Steppeson
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Todd Bonzalez
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
27/ Anyway, I am still baffled by the idea that Christians must acknowledge that decent people dress in formal suits, and not in sloppy clothing like hoodies and sandals Congrats, @twkiter, you broke my brainpic.twitter.com/8Kg7661Qmo
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Zombie Claude Rains
28/ Absolutely agreed. You offer a 19th century miner a choice between a cotton T shirt and Carhartt overalls, and the layered linen and wool getup he had back then, I'm sure he'd jump at the Carhartt in half a secondhttps://twitter.com/ZombieClaudeR/status/1346832346067075072 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
Zombie Claude Rains @ZombieClaudeRReplying to @MorlockPOveralls are formal attire in what era? Because that's what I see a lot of in century old, give or take, images of laborers. The range of materials and manufacturing methods also played a role. A lot of modern stuff would have sold and been widely adopted if offered.1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Zombie Claude Rains
29/ good insighthttps://twitter.com/ZombieClaudeR/status/1346832897559302146 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
-
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Warmest Regards
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP
Denim Respecter checking in here. Levi Strauss & co. did for attire what Ray Kroc did for cuisine and Stan Lee/Jack Kirby did for comics.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Spivonomist @MorlockP
levis were for working men, until middle class hippies started aping their fashions in the 60s, i think?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
