> I’ve been argued in and out of a few outré theories in my life. (Only the best outré theories, I assure you.) Fun to see MM esoterically referenced like this https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/opinion/sunday/trump-election-fraud.html …
-
-
3/
@DouthatNYT says this in the paper that pushed the 1619 narrative > Finally to the radicalized, I’ve tried to convey, based on my own knowledge of how liberal institutions work, that what looked stage-managed to outsiders in May and June actually reflected organic upheavalShow this thread -
4/ > Have I persuaded anyone with these arguments? Maybe not, as a columnist for a noted establishment organ, I’m probably not the best person to make them anyway. That distinction belongs to people more enmeshed in the conservative universe, scribes for National Review


Show this thread -
5/ As if any actual conservatives listen to or trust the absolutely cucked National "let's compromise on 12 more social issues, ship more jobs to China bc muh neoliberalism, and spend another trillion dollars fighting camel f@ckers bc American Empire" Review
Show this thread -
6/ The NRO generation had their chance, and they wasted it The time for politely losing and congratulating the leftists on a good game, old chap! as they gang bang you is over. Zombie Reaganism is no longer on the menu National Divorce, Brazilian anarchotyranny, and Boog are left
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not only incompetently delivered, but (apparently) without substantial evidentiary support.
-
Every time I pick one to dig into, I seem to end at either "this was a first time poll watcher who didn't understand" or more usually "that's not how math even works, come the fsck on". If there's a competent steelman of claims that aren't obviously innumerate I haven't seen it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.