The answer to this take lies in the word "should". Why shouldn't they? The only real argument I've seen is this might tempt them to cheat on their marriage, but I've not seen a particularly strong justification for this that doesn't result in puritanism. https://t.co/HIrVKFjPoN
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
Replying to @drethelin
Needs to be analyzed in terms of false negatives, false positives, and ROI. Eliminating ALL opposite sex friends decreases risk by X but at cost Y. Having very close opposite sex friends gives benefit Q at risk R. Pence rule or other boundaries are likely Schelling pt sweet spots
0 replies
1 retweet
9 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.