-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
well, no, that’s not what happened here
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm confused by the article. Did she vote her dead husband's registration and her own, or did she vote her own registration as registered "Mrs. So-and-so"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s not what the article says. She voted as Mrs.+husbands name, which is legally her name not his. She did not vote twice. Come on, I have extensive evidence that you can read better than that.
-
Even if she didn't vote twice, it's still illegal to vote using somebody else's identity, and it should be.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Those replies man, almost no "stop and think about it" at all there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"No my dead husband doesn't vote, I voted for him." "Understandable, have a good day."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The article is unclear, but it looks like she voted only once, using her formal married name: “Mrs. (Husband’s full name).”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.