6/ There are three classes of topics: * Shanequa made me stand 40 feet back when 6 is legal * observers were sent home and 20,000 votes were "counted" without witnesses * the CIA / Soros is using HAMMER to remote login to voting machines and change totals Only #2 is important.
-
Show this thread
-
7/ Re #1: unless Shanequa being rude and actually breaking the law is part of a LARGER claim about thousands of fake ballots, then it's not relevant to the outcomes Re #3: speculation is useless. Prove it. Most of the sftwr stuff seems like typical shoddy industry practice.
1 reply 1 retweet 22 likesShow this thread -
8/ ...and, no, "typical industry practice" is absolutely unacceptable for voting software. But that's a different topic than "what electors get sent to DC and who's the next POTUS".
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
9/ The ONLY thing that I find very interesting right now is "Was there mass fraud in 2-3 Dem machine cities?" I ask friends if there's evidence, and I get told "yes". I ask for links, and I get links to affidavits that ... really don't prove much of anything.
1 reply 2 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
10/ Now, I entirely understand that the good hard content, if it exists, is in lawsuits, and not being thrown around twitter. And maybe not all of those suits have been filed yet. So I'm giving this another week or so. Perhaps there are some absolutely killer suits queued up
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
11/ Let me weigh in with my intuitions, expressed as probabilities, on a few things. Software first: * there are tons of bugs: 100% * the engineers know there are bugs: 100% * the CEO of the firm has heard that there are bugs: 100% * some machines were left on the net: 95+%
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
12/ * software updates to machines were installed in a sloppy, against policy manner: 95% * races were configured poorly, leading to tabulation errors: 95% * the software firm has CEO / investors / etc who are involved in D politics: 95%
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likesShow this thread -
13/ * the CEO / Board of Directors exploited bugs or backdoors in the code to "fix" races for Dem candidates: much much less than 1% Sure, it's possible, but I just don't see anyone being that coordinated AND that willing to take a risk, while leaving fingerprints all over it.
5 replies 1 retweet 17 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @DeanBradleySFF @MorlockP
This. It's not coordinated at a state or national level. It's people at the precinct being asked to "help out" and "do their part" with a wink and nod. It's all completely deniable once you get above precinct level.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP @DeanBradleySFF
I was an election judge for about 7 years. I understand how the game works.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.