People say things like this when they haven't researched the issue at all, and want to virtue signal that they're smart and on the "right team". It's so cringe.https://twitter.com/garethlpowell/status/1327039829247455233 …
-
-
3/ I dug into this a few weeks agohttps://twitter.com/MorlockP/status/1321908683056517120?s=20 …
Show this thread -
4/ This is the road that
@garethlpowell is upset about.https://twitter.com/CarlHedgren/status/1322124620154179584?s=19 …
Show this thread -
5/ Wikipedia has it's limitations, of course, but it's pretty embarrassing to weigh in on an issue without having EVEN read the wiki page.
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ah, okay. Now the objection makes a lot less sense.
-
No, it still makes plenty of sense. If this tunnel starts being dug without proper archaeological survey first, potentially up to half a million artefacts will be lost because SURPRISINGLY, the archaeological record isn't contained to just below Stonehenge.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
