trying to understand this NYT article
as best I can grok:
* these women modelled for a photgrapher
* they signed releases saying he could use the photos
* he paid them
* he used the photos
* HOW DARE HE / MALE PRILEVE / MORAL EQUIVALENT OF RAPE
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/12/style/jonathan-leder-photographer-emily-ratajowski.html?action=click&module=News&pgtype=Homepage …
-
-
3/ A little bird tells me > It’s a Model Alliance press release. They’re trying to unionize models, which ain’t gonna happen, and suck up donations and attention while they tilt at that particular windmill. They also pressure models to make accusations against photographers >>>
Show this thread -
4/ >>> The photographer won’t sue for defamation because most photographers don’t have the money or are public figures and nobody will take the case. Especially in New York.


Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
indeed, look at that poor woman who can't keep one night stands from turning into "nonconsensual relationships" - she's definitely not in charge of herself. and if no one else is (and it looks like no one else is), she's in trouble.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.