4/ if so, then new voters split 117:1 for Biden vs Trump? is this somehow more plausible than the initial claim? the raw data for # voters, # new voters is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Georgia …https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Georgia_elections …
-
-
15/ Rebuttal to the assumed fact!https://twitter.com/stbronnenberg/status/1326635517920862208?s=19 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd like to see randomly sampled ballots from that batch pulled and a small sample of the ink bubbled in subjected to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Find out if it's a handful of the same pens that produced them, and if so, it's time for a do-over (and prison).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Okay but first we need to verify the 117:1 part.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is the data establishing the skewing?
-
see what I quote-tweeted in #1 in this thread
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
But Space Dog, haven't you heard that there's no evidence whatsoever for any voter fraud?pic.twitter.com/hcUsSseisH
-
"When queried, 100% of top election officials self-reported that they are performing their jobs well."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The One Law Of Probability: Long enough odds don’t happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.