I see a lot of responses to this arguing "no, some people would do that". But guys ...at a 117:1 ratio? this doesn't _smell_ like bull crap, this looks, smells, sounds, and TASTES like it. 2:1 ? Sure, maybe 5:1 ? ....uh, well, ...COULD be 10:1 ? um... 117:1 ?https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1326583758070439936 …
-
-
12/ But effectively ZERO PERCENT OF THEM remembered to vote on ANYTHING other than POTUS? Here's a much simpler theory which explains this evidence: The local Dem machine is used to stealing a few votes, panicked, and tried to load up fake ballots as quickly as possible.
Show this thread -
13/ Very tight deadlines. Hours, not days. A mad scramble to fill out blank ballots in a back room, a dozen people hastily filling in the oval for Biden and NOTHING ELSE. in 5 minutes you can fill out 50 "Biden" ballots ...or 5 "Straight D" tickets. The machine chose path A.
Show this thread -
14/ I have zero proof ... but to my mind it is a far easier to swallow the theory "people have incentives and bend laws" than "first time voters broke 117:1 for Biden ... and ALSO didn't know how to fill out more than one oval".
Show this thread -
15/ Rebuttal to the assumed fact!https://twitter.com/stbronnenberg/status/1326635517920862208?s=19 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And knowing that they could swing two senate seats, you’d assume they’d ensure their first time voters at least checked three boxes, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.