I see a lot of responses to this arguing "no, some people would do that". But guys ...at a 117:1 ratio? this doesn't _smell_ like bull crap, this looks, smells, sounds, and TASTES like it. 2:1 ? Sure, maybe 5:1 ? ....uh, well, ...COULD be 10:1 ? um... 117:1 ?https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1326583758070439936 …
-
-
11/ You're telling me that Dems spent hundreds of millions of dollars to educate and develop new Dem voters, and pretty much 0% of these people voted for ANY Senator, or ANY Representative? Sure, new / low information voters will vote less down-ticket, maybe even randomly.
Show this thread -
12/ But effectively ZERO PERCENT OF THEM remembered to vote on ANYTHING other than POTUS? Here's a much simpler theory which explains this evidence: The local Dem machine is used to stealing a few votes, panicked, and tried to load up fake ballots as quickly as possible.
Show this thread -
13/ Very tight deadlines. Hours, not days. A mad scramble to fill out blank ballots in a back room, a dozen people hastily filling in the oval for Biden and NOTHING ELSE. in 5 minutes you can fill out 50 "Biden" ballots ...or 5 "Straight D" tickets. The machine chose path A.
Show this thread -
14/ I have zero proof ... but to my mind it is a far easier to swallow the theory "people have incentives and bend laws" than "first time voters broke 117:1 for Biden ... and ALSO didn't know how to fill out more than one oval".
Show this thread -
15/ Rebuttal to the assumed fact!https://twitter.com/stbronnenberg/status/1326635517920862208?s=19 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.