Fun times when I can pretty much predict what the right wing tweets are going to say about vote fraud by assuming they'll be exactly the damn same as the left wing tweets were in 2016.
> watching every count Except for where they were illegally excluded > count So presume 100% accurate counting of inaccurate / fraudulent ballots injected before the count...
-
-
> Except for where they were illegally excluded The only accusation of that I'm aware of, when it got to court, turned out to be "a full complement of GOP observers were inside and the people outside were some random yahoos who turned up to throw a tantrum".
-
Nope. There are others. Legal observers w ID refused entrance. Other legal observers allowed inside but kept 200 feet away.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
> So presume 100% accurate counting of inaccurate / fraudulent ballots injected before the count... Looking for those is why observers are allowed to raise ballot challenges and insist on extra scrutiny. It's not perfect (see the D and R fraud cases we found earlier) but still.
-
Count observers can do nothing about a blank mail in ballot signed by an elderly person and then filled in by a party functionary before being delivered. A social worker was arrested for this 2 days ago, and its a well known scam.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.