1/ I started to read this and before I was halfway done, I smelled bullshit. Note that he does not say "directly under Stonehenge". He says "directly under the Stonehenge World Heritage Site." My nares flared.https://twitter.com/Celtic_Films/status/1321727940564979713 …
-
-
7/ "Directly. Under."https://twitter.com/CarlHedgren/status/1322124620154179584?s=19 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel shades of this sentiment with every headline I read.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always read these things as ultimately being the clash of two opposing cabals of sorcerers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the distance, stonehenge. Here, the road in question.pic.twitter.com/4jyyea57Oc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From what I’ve heard the controversy is primarily about how the tunnel would destroy potential archaeological sites in the area. But that disruption is a price any conventional road or other construction has to pay one way or another
-
Read the Wikipedia page. The "anti" tunnel people want a LONGER tunnel.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
how big is the SITE?
Google took 2 seconds to tell me: