25/ eh, "induced" If a friend buys a car model with twice as many HP as he really needs, and a crappy 5 year repair record, do we blame the salesman? https://twitter.com/DeanBradleySFF/status/1319253442976677893 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
26/ To the best of my knowledge, no one has even alleged that they deceived the FDA. https://twitter.com/DeanBradleySFF/status/1319254025016147968 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
27/ If the salesman tells you that the 400 HP Kawasaki street bike is "the perfect family vehicle", and the mandatory 8 page government-approved sticker on the wind screen says "0.5% chance of exploding; APPROVED by the US Gov motorcycle bureau" ... https://twitter.com/DeanBradleySFF/status/1319254293430571009 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
28/ Gosh, if only the risk of addiction was mentioned somewhere in the top half inch or so of the mandatory warnings ....pic.twitter.com/mTywpmPF7s
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
30/ > violating the anti-kickback statute That law sounds like something that is definitely constitutional and within the powers of Congress, and totally not something that snuck in under "interstate commerce" https://twitter.com/DeanBradleySFF/status/1319254841047265280 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.3 replies 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
31/ I have no problem if Colt Manufacturing wants to pay a gun dealer $100 for every AR-15 he sells. And, in fact, that's legal. The anti-kickback statute appears to be a small bandaid on top of a stupid self inflected wound >>>
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
32/ The USG decided to (unconstitutionally) pay for health care costs for individuals ... and then got upset that pharma companies and doctors were using their 1A rights. ...so they criminalized the exercise of the 1A in certain situations https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1320a-7b …
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
33/ > The entire FDA is a commerce clause farce yes, this is the correct conservative opinion https://twitter.com/DeanBradleySFF/status/1319256045403934720 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
34/ > but once it exists people should be able to have a well-founded reliance on what they've said. This is the medical version of the David French "well, maybe drag queen story hour isn't ideal, but it's already here, so a TRULY conservative court would keep it legal" take.
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread
35/ But that said, I understand your point. It's relatively small and nuanced, and I could be persuaded. ...but this thread is not about "should regulations, if they exist, be stable and predictable?" It's re "should conservatives celebrate the theft of a billion $ company?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.