1/ I agree with this. And it's inevitable - the principal / agent problem can't be worked around. Plunkitt ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Plunkitt … ) talked about "honest graft" vs "dishonest graft". I disagree with his stance on the issue, but it does get to the point that >>>https://twitter.com/jordanthelawyer/status/1317485536890806274 …
-
-
8/ If RETIRED Bill Clinton can put the CEO of Expedia in touch with the right social crowd, and that's worth $350k/yr payoff to Chelsea...ugh, it's grotesque, but we've got to eat it. If Hunter Biden is selling access to the next POTUS to CCP-connected Chinese CEOs >>>
Show this thread -
9/ and Hunter is kicking half of that up to the POTUS himself ... holy cow, that's orders of magnitude worse. ....and that concludes my TED talk on the difference between tolerable and intolerable graft.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Um. I suggest digging into that a bit more. To my understanding 1) The prosecutor was forced out because he *wasn't* going after corruption - the US, UK and various other governments all wanted him out for that reason 2) Burisma's board expansion that added Hunter was afterwards
-
There are lots of contemporaneous news reports about just how pissed western governments were with the prosecutor. So the whole "Biden had him fired to protect Hunter" thing requires one to disregard all available evidence *and* the concept of linear time.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.