One evolution in my thinking over the last ~5 years is that I now hate High Theory I find a few other people using the phrase, but no crisp definitions so I'm going to attempt one. It will necessarily be wrong ...if I claimed it was simple AND correct IT WOULD BE A HIGH THEORY
-
-
5/ High brow examples of High Theory are whatever most philosophers are nattering on about, and anything 1 or 2 steps removed from a TED talk.
Show this thread -
6/ Einstein said "make things as simple as possible, but no simpler". High Theory overshoots the mark and makes things way too simple. hilarious explanation of every High Theory ever -->https://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/967114911401652225 …
Show this thread -
7/ Libertarian High Theory says things like "without the state redistributing wealth illegitimately and creating crimes, we wouldn't need jails" This theory is too simple in a dozen different ways. - There have always been murders and rapes - laws that are indeed BS tend to >
Show this thread -
8/ ensnare the low conscientious and criminal. The guy who was drinking in public is almost certainly causing all sorts of other problems...and would under any system of governance.
Show this thread -
9/ Red Tribe High Theory is that we need a praetorian class and a return (RETVRN!) to traditional values, and then everything will be good. ...as if (a) feedback loops w cops aren't fundamentally broken, or (b) there was ever a golden age, or (c) RETVRN is possible
Show this thread -
10/ Aesthetic High Theory is that if we simply (SIMPLY!) prioritized nice livable environments we'd all live in wood frame cottages, eat home cooked meals, have babbling brooks in the back yard, etc., but greedy architects / planners / whoever stole it all from us.
Show this thread -
11/ The canonical example of High Theory that I like to point out is the bumper sticker that, say, a music teacher will have on her crappy used car "teach music; build world peace" (or whatever dumb variant) It's a coupling of all good things, or all bad things One single root
Show this thread -
12/ The One Single Root aspect of high theory is what makes it so appealing If only we could FORCE THEM TO OBEY THE CONSTITUTION, or TEACH THEM NOT TO RAPE, or whatev then not only would crime fall to zero, but the genders would live in peace, and it would never rain on picnics
Show this thread -
13/ Someone (Joel on Software? JWZ?) wrote an essay once about how everyone wants to rewrite the crufty old code to simplify it...but every bit of that cruft is a work around for a specific scenario, or a fix, or a feature someone wants. Books start w no page numbers >
Show this thread -
14/ transition to roman numerals, and then transition to arabic numerals. You can simplify the word processor, but you then start removing compatibility with desires for such features. ...but even this is effectively a pragmatic argument. My argument about Theory is not JUST
Show this thread -
15/ pragmatic. It's more about correct analysis of things. It is just flat out wrong to assert that we only have cars because the auto mfgrs bought up the streetcars and dismantled them. That's true (slightly) but the results are overdetermined.
Show this thread -
16/ We are a car based society for dozens of reasons - each of them with a different coefficient. We have rape for dozens of reasons, each with a different coefficient. We have copyright law for dozens of reasons. And, in turn, each of these "things" is not one thing but
Show this thread -
17/ a cluster of things. Cars are tools to commute, and to transport kids, and to shop, AND status symbols, AND mating tools, and and and Democracy is a tool for selecting rulers, AND a tool of mythmaking, AND an outlet for sociopaths, AND a historic accident, AND ...
Show this thread -
18/ And so any attempt to say that democracy IS X, or MEANS X,or is INCOMPATIBLE with Y, is wrong, because "democracy" is really a cluster of different / overlapping things. This is bad news for the rationalist enterprise (both the modern one in 2020 and the earlier wave >
Show this thread -
19/ ...that day dreamed of formal languages for debating propositions using Boolean logic, etc. Moldbug is pretty formalist and High Theory, and this is to be expected, because he's autistic & we autists love high theory I like reading Molds bc his theories and writing are fun
Show this thread -
20/ ...but Molds really only does a tiny bit of high theory. A LOT of what he writes is really more the footnotes, and footnotes are inherently anti-high theory. High theory is about principles divorced from details, and footnotes are details. High theory can't survive >
Show this thread -
21/ impact with footnotes. Footnotes complicate, diffuse, and render the monocausal multi-causal.
Show this thread -
22/ I think that High Theory is oversupplied relative to ideal market clearing quantities bc it's fun to do, easy to do, and it looks high status. Confidence is attractive, and so flatly asserting "All governments derive from <X>" sounds both smart and confident.
Show this thread -
23/ High theory is basically bumper sticker campaigning, but at a meta level, not an object level. Bumper sticker: No farms no food (e.g. "I'm virtuous and important for farming") High theory: "All power flows from the control of resources" or whatever
Show this thread -
24/ and... I dunno where I'm going with this. Basically, this, I guess: almost everything in the real world is messy. Code has more parts than you might thing. Rivers have no one "head water". Every machine has hundreds of parts. ...and High Theory ignores all of this.
Show this thread -
25/ Let me propose an inversion of Occam's Razor: instead of "do not needlessly multiple causes", "do not needlessly ignore causes".
Show this thread -
26/ well, I do agree that it's better if multiple Causes are being debated at once ...but I think that in practice, the result is not most ideological consumers handcrafting results using a diversity of parts ... but each person subscribing to >>>https://twitter.com/aashiq/status/1315654499965394944 …
Show this thread -
27/ Either Oww My Balls, Oww My Ball Two, or Oww My Balls Eight ("The Ocho").
Show this thread -
28/ "Everything is very simple in war, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen war." - Clausewitz
Show this thread -
29/ "Everything is very simple in Theory, but the simplest thing is complicated in Reality. These complications accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen Reality." - me
Show this thread -
30/ Yep. All "seeing like a state" is based on Theory. https://twitter.com/1337kestrel/status/1315655140398030848 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
33/ I'm a huge fan of "theories" - I just hate High Theory. Theories help organize and explain. High theory blinds. https://twitter.com/PereGrimmer/status/1315664515934162946 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
34/ We agree here. I'm just using "High theory" in the way that you use "theory that starts with theory and cherry picks data", and "low theory" in the way you use "starting with facts and then testing". https://twitter.com/PereGrimmer/status/1315664748378230784 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
is