11/ > You're a sci-fi artist and this is your take? This is like barley scratching the surface of how weird shit is gonna get, who said I didn't predict this? Who said I don't think the world will get weird yet? This is an obvious development, we've assumed AI for decades.
-
Show this thread
-
12/ > better learn to adapt. Who said that I was upset re my own career? This tool will just let people who can't write at all write like Brometheus, and will let Brometheus write like someone who is worthy of getting rejected by Baen. This doesn't hurt me.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
13/ > People literally thought women reading novels was going to cause all sorts of problems, ' They were right. https://twitter.com/CyberneticMelon/status/1314573383934377984 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
14/ > These tools could help more people enter the space, not less. Exactly! Democratization is bad. https://twitter.com/CyberneticMelon/status/1314573787506126849 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
15/ well, I'm 90% shitpoasting... RT
@mr_archenemy > Democratization is bad. if by this you mean "lowering the cost of entry", i disagree (which i think this is very different than this AI tool ridiculousness, about which i do agree you).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
16/ Let me rephrase: - quality follows a power law - there are arbitrary cut-off points. Publishing Inc. used to cut off the bottom 95%. Ability to focus and stick words together currently cuts off the bottom 50%. - lowering cost of entry is good - effective search is too
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
17/ Barriers to entry impacts search quality. All barriers to entry have both false positives and false negatives. High barriers to entry have tons of false negatives (good books excluded). Low barriers to entry reduce false negatives and create false positives. >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
18/ By which I mean, if you picked a random SF book off the shelf in 1990, 90% would have been good, 1% bad. If you pick a random SF book off of kindle today, 90% are bad. GPT tools that allow more creation will make this worse. 99% will be bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
19/ E.g. look at the text that @lexirad CHOSE to highlight of what great work her tool can do. This is TERRIBLE. https://twitter.com/Lexirad/status/1314271681939034112 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
20/ I mean, it's not as bad as Brometheus tier, I admit that, but it's still not the kind of thing anyone should be reading. (side note: wonder if the GPT-3 will write a book on how to write as poorly as it writes?)
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
21/ Smart people: I am interested in history as far back as the Bronze Age, so that I can compare modernity to a baseline Average people: I am interest in history back to WWII NEETS: don't bore me w 20 yr old news, boomer ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://twitter.com/CyberneticMelon/status/1314581301954072576 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.