Yeah not true. Berger is a notorious liar. That’s the cost of the development of an enteriely new engine, decided by the amount of engines NASA is going to buy The actual cost per engine is far lower
-
-
Replying to @ThePrimalDino @joshuaRenkema and
I would love to see your sources and price analysis.
5 replies 3 retweets 110 likes -
Replying to @DJSnM @ThePrimalDino and
The math is pretty simple. You add up the value of the contracts NASA has given AJR for engines, and divide it by the number of engines AJR is delivering.
5 replies 1 retweet 98 likes -
Replying to @SciGuySpace @DJSnM and
bio of
@ThePrimalDino: "SLS is litterally the best thing." LOL1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @ThePrimalDino @SciGuySpace and
Not at all. SLS is my absolute favorite rocket in the set of things-that-dont-exist-and-will-be-disposable-if-they're-ever-delivered
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @SciGuySpace and
SLS exists what are you talking aboutpic.twitter.com/CSAYpB5NpD
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ThePrimalDino @MorlockP and
Yeah, you're right. Every single piece of SLS is already been built, so... why the first launch is scheduled no earlier than late 2021?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @AstroDalem @ThePrimalDino and
I'm sure that the SLS first launch will happen on schedule! That's one thing I've definitely learned from watching the Constellation / SLS since 2005.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @SciGuySpace and
SLS didn’t exist until 2011 but keep on trying
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
oh, good catch - if only I had phrased the tweet as "watching the Constellation / SLS since 2005."
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.