I was quoting an article from @SciGuySpace https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/05/nasa-will-pay-a-staggering-146-million-for-each-sls-rocket-engine/ …
-
-
Replying to @joshuaRenkema @NASAStennis and
Yeah not true. Berger is a notorious liar. That’s the cost of the development of an enteriely new engine, decided by the amount of engines NASA is going to buy The actual cost per engine is far lower
5 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @ThePrimalDino @joshuaRenkema and
I would love to see your sources and price analysis.
5 replies 3 retweets 110 likes -
Replying to @DJSnM @ThePrimalDino and
The math is pretty simple. You add up the value of the contracts NASA has given AJR for engines, and divide it by the number of engines AJR is delivering.
5 replies 1 retweet 98 likes -
Replying to @SciGuySpace @DJSnM and
bio of
@ThePrimalDino: "SLS is litterally the best thing." LOL1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @ThePrimalDino @SciGuySpace and
Not at all. SLS is my absolute favorite rocket in the set of things-that-dont-exist-and-will-be-disposable-if-they're-ever-delivered
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @SciGuySpace and
SLS exists what are you talking aboutpic.twitter.com/CSAYpB5NpD
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ThePrimalDino @MorlockP and
Yeah, you're right. Every single piece of SLS is already been built, so... why the first launch is scheduled no earlier than late 2021?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @AstroDalem @MorlockP and
Because the core stage is stuck at stennis space center And it’s no LATER than late 2021 It could easily be in mid 2021
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I definitely think it will be mid-2021. Maybe even earlier! There's absolutely no reason to think that this program will miss a deadline, ever.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.