You know, under the "Brown M&M" theory, this is maybe not a bad thing. A guy who just steals stuff doesn't belong among decent people. > “three strikes” laws, are a relic of failed “tough on crime” policies Note how they smuggled in the word "failed" Three strike laws WORKEDhttps://twitter.com/TimCushing/status/1313286927156641792 …
-
-
5/ Just as 1 tablespoon of feces in a cask of wine yields 50 gallons of feces, 1 habitual felon on an otherwise high trust society of 1,000 people yields ... a low trust society where everyone locks their doors and bars their windows. "Exit" is good. ...and so is "Exile".
Show this thread -
6/ > “Mr. Bryant has already spent nearly 23 years in prison and is now over 60 years old,” she wrote. “If he lives another 20 years, Louisiana taxpayers will have paid almost one million dollars to punish Mr. Bryant for his failed effort to steal a set of hedge clippers.”
Show this thread -
7/ That's one take. Here's mine: If he lives another 20 years, Louisiana taxpayers will have paid almost one million dollars to keep a reckless, low-conscientiousness civilization-defector who destroys utility everywhere he goes away from decent people. A bargain!
Show this thread -
8/ The tragedy of the commons is responsible for: - overgrazing pastures - overlogging unowned forests - driving whales to extinction - polluting the oceans with plastic - allowing civilization-defectors to destroy the high-trust nature of society
Show this thread -
9/ yes, but OTOH, we need to be cognizant that some people mean well but just don't have much intelligence or conscientiousness, and so we should make it EASY to obey laws https://twitter.com/DrStoutIV/status/1313470915829735425 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
11/ strong rebutting argument! --->https://twitter.com/random_eddie/status/1313613539391746048 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Implusivity/testosterone/age correlations suggest it might still not be worthwile to continue his incarceration past a certain age. False positive/negative trade-offs, of course, but the criminal justice system is made out of those anyway.
-
agreed I'm not arguing that we SHOULD, per se. I'm arguing against the strawman argument they're mounting for why we SHOULDN'T.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.