1/ I see this on all sides: "THE argument for X was Y ; Q disproves Y". Used for all sorts of things: covid, tax policy, whatever. Every step in the logic is wrong. Most policies have multiple reasons and trade-offs, and no single occurrence Q invalidates Y.https://twitter.com/bethanyshondark/status/1313160665729765381 …
-
-
4/ ...as we do so, we need to keep a careful eye on transmission rates and hospital loading, and reevaluate in a month or two". Now compare this to "If Trump can’t do that, well, there goes the whole ship." No. No. Nothing about one person or even 100 catching covid >>>
Show this thread -
5/ Refutes or even calls into question the framework for deciding on lockdown vs reopening. N.B. : this is not a defense of Trump, his choices about masks, or anything else. It's a rant on comparing incommensurable things.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.