As a second amendment supporter I'd settle for an EM rail gun powered by a fusion reactor. Commonsense regulation ftw.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
perhaps the best situation would be massive nuclear proliferation, plus something like the Eridani Edict where everyone agrees to kick the crap out of anyone who uses nukes first
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There should be family atomics
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Old: 2 senators per state New: 2 nuclear missiles per state
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The wording is targeted to that more common audience, but if you think N is good then picking max N is the way to answer this question.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I like a little more nuance... nukes for Switzerland and Sweden (that the US pressured into neutering themselves), no nukes for North Korea and Pakistan (where the US paid for the nukes and sent them nuclear fuel...) Real weapons to worry about are biological, memetic, drones.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Remember the Probability Broach sequels? You probably recall them better than I do. Anyhoo, one of them addresses the question of whether or not the right to bear arms includes the right to own nuclear weapons. And I see your answer is "yes!"
-
LOL, wife and i were talking about that book yesterday
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.