I find III A interesting. You have to keep your police budget, no matter what! Town population decreases 50% and you don't need those services? Tough shit. Keep paying or lose any other state funds. This is awful on so many different levels.
-
-
-
Interesting lack of addressing "catch and release" non-prosecution. Asserting felony for assaulting officers means little if the prosecutor won't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To be fair, if they were really praetorians we'd probably have slightly less idiotic rulers. And probably no Drug War, if they could just raise their own salaries without becoming cartel subcontractors...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm reading some terrible possible incentives into most of these. But III (C) I kinda like. Do not see why the new criminalization is needed, rather than just enforcement of existing laws.
-
But such is the case of many “new” laws
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
tired of these adjectives. how about "craven" legislation instead? or "vile"?
-
Ill-considered? Foolhardy? Pandering? There are so many options.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A friend in Arizona recently got a "blue alert" on his phone, regarding an attack on a police officer. Something is completely upside-down about that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That idea in particular I'd love to see stricken from the list, but several of the others are improvements over existing law. In my own state, I know of a couple cases of innocent drivers being caught up in "peaceful protests" that involved surrounding/intimidating them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.