contrary take on the long haul, interesting, I'm mixed on thishttps://twitter.com/PeterZeihan/status/1306283325368262656?s=19 …
-
Show this thread
-
eigenrobot Retweeted
eigenrobot added,
This Tweet is unavailable.3 replies 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
after naval enthusiasts commented in replies at Length and noted that China is not building any carrier groups I am revising downward my belief that power projection has anything to do with this so combination of area denial + giant empty city-style investment more likely? idk
6 replies 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
eigenrobot Retweeted
Navy nerds strike back https://twitter.com/halvorz/status/1306650713817255936?s=19 …
eigenrobot added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
oh hmm that is quite a builduppic.twitter.com/Hh2Vof259c
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
wait did any of those actually get built India still has one iirc and Japan . . . just got one?
6 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eigenrobot
to a good approximation, only the US has aircraft carriers a few other countries have a handful as prestige items, but if you look at their days-at-sea-per-year they're ... uh also, ability to sustain flight operations is likewise ... uh Did a deep dive on this a few yrs back
3 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_in_service … CATOBAR is the only ** REAL ** type of A.C. STOBAR is second tier maintaining a real AC is actually an INSANELY HARD thing, it requires a MASSIVE pyramid of cultural and economic competence
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
to put on AC in the field with 1,000 sailers you need a service academy, a massive training infrastructure, etc that runs to 10,000 or 50,000 people, then you need a logistics supply chain, all sorts of mil repair shops so that broken components (and things break CONTINUOUSLY)
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
can be removed from the ship / the planes, replaced with spares from on-ship stores, handed off to ferry ships which run broken parts back, immediately refill on-ship stores with new spares that were already in the pipelines, ferries bring broken back to labs where >
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes
things are analyzed and swapped out at sub-assembly level (perhaps one whole avionics cage got shipped back, it's opened up and 2 boards are pulled and replaced). Assembly rotated back towards the A.C. while the sub assemblies are further diagnosed
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
and you need an entire culture of truth-tellers not yes-men to investigate WHY components failed, and revision the boards or systems or whatever The US invented aircraft carriers in 1930 or so and has a century's worth of experience. Starting from scratch it might take >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
30 years, absolute best case, to catch up with us?
5 replies 0 retweets 8 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.