Morlock has spilled many bytes addressing that notion in excruciating detail and repetition. Upshot: there are rules the good old boys enacted, M & G bought property accepting those rules, G pointedly & aggressively violated those rules to M’s objective loss, M enforcing rules.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
it's not a pole barn ; it's a steel frame 25' high, two story, 40' x 60' industrial building placed 18' from my property, when his land is 325' wide and he has 1.6 acres dozen other places he could place it, but he CHOSE to violate the law bc obeying it would mean 1 hr of work
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Of course it changes something. A bunch of people agreed on a rule so much they made it legally enforceable on others. Obeying that rule only took building 10’ the other way, taking 1 hour additional effort - and M would have paid the cost involved. G didn’t - why?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It’s enough that M exerted great effort to prevent it, and is motivated to reverse it. Yes, 10 feet can make that much difference, even in the country.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
> I think your problem with your neighbors is more that they’re white trash and cluttering up the neighborhood then the fact their shop is 10 feet the wrong way. your thinking is wrong I lived w their clutter for 7 years and never invoked the law which forbids it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
> that's a pretty normal shop not in this town / not on this road, which was settled by Quakers a quarter of a millenium ago, and which is dotted with antique and charming clapboard sided barns and homes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.