court in 19 minutes, in the case of "one hobo farmer vs an illegal 4,800 square foot industrial building"
-
-
7/ Indeed. And as hard as the variance procedure is, if you violate a Cease & Desist, and build anyway, then you can't apply for a variance but for an equitable waiver of dimensional requirements, which is even harder.https://twitter.com/DJSchreffler/status/1305900286196813827 …
Show this thread -
-
9/ yep every now and then I go back and review the timeline and boggle at the shear idiocy of it all https://twitter.com/fridryk/status/1305949546367705088 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
10/ in a few yrs when it's all done, should I write & publish The Saga of the Barn? https://twitter.com/coinaday1/status/1305951106393047042 …
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Fair. I was thinking more like those massive ~1k gallon ones, or a more involved electrical excavation. In either case, variance first, or at least at C&D time would have been far more prudent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Hardship" means hardship to the property, not "labor or money intensive." It means the property cannot physically accommodate a compliant building. This guy said that while represented? Did the lawyer slo-mo jump across the courtroom yelling "Noooooo!!!!" ??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.