> harms
> products enjoyed by billions of people
https://twitter.com/spiderfoods/status/1302977093693833216 …
-
Show this thread
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
2/ It absolutely is deniable, and I deny it. The product used to suit demographic X 75% well. Now the product suits demographic X, Y, and Z 70% well. More utility is being created, and you're universalizing your experience as a member of X. >>> https://twitter.com/PhilthyPhil2012/status/1302978243792838657 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
3/ This is one big source of intellectual / rhetorical derp in NRx adjacent spaces: they look at commerce which serves real working families very well (e.g. highway rest stop with gas and fast food) and contrast it to some mythical golden age where everyone ate goose & truffles
3 replies 4 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @MorlockP @DogmanRespecter
This is only tangentially related but I’m reading a book about French peasants in the 1800s right now and people really don’t grok that “home cooking” for most people used to mean gruel, bread from 6 months ago, barely any salt, and no butter or spices or meat.
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes
Exactly. Folks look at charming houses that were owned by financial elites (e.g. Amsterdam trading families, or minor nobility) in 1890, compare it to their own heated and A/C apartments that they, as middle class people, can trivially afford in 2020, and complain re capitalism
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.