1) Never seen that shirt and it appears to have 3 stars across the top. I doubt there is a Q FSP shirt 2) Never seen that person 3) You seem more negative than positive towards FSP, which is contrary to success. Always open to discuss how we can do better
-
-
Replying to @jeremykauffman @MorlockP
Expanding on 3, you are a very smart person which means in any popular movement you join there will be many people dumber than you, and they will sometimes do dumb things, and you will struggle to respect them Just something to think about
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jeremykauffman
> Expanding on 3, you are a very smart person which means in any popular movement you join there will be many people dumber than you, and they will sometimes do dumb things, and you will struggle to respect them Obviously we are all constrained by our nature. >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @jeremykauffman
A 100 IQ person will not make 150 IQ decisions. And that's ok / to be expected. ...but I see a lot of actively practiced ANTI wisdom, where someone with a 120 IQ makes 90 IQ decisions. ...and this isn't ORTHOGONAL to libertarian politics; it's often CAUSED BY IT. >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @jeremykauffman
People smart enough to struggle through Ayn Rand discard 3,000 years of Chesteron Fences and decide "ah, the ONLY reason for monogamy / jobs / bourgeois values is Stupid Sky God, and I'm far too smart for that, so ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @jeremykauffman
... I'll sleep on a couch, earn money by trading weed and 'collectible silver agoric ingots', and redefine 'the family' to mean a group of strangers sharing a geodesic dome or a tent, as long as they've signed a contract on the blockchain"pic.twitter.com/hzc3u2rEU3
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @jeremykauffman
the FSP ORGANIZATION is great. The average quality of the kind of person who identifies as FSP is not. I'm happy to hear feedback on how I can craft my message so as to not hurt the FSP, if you've got any.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @jeremykauffman
but, to go on the OFFENSE (for rhetorical purposes! ), one issue that any organization has is that its members are ambassadors for it / for its brand, and every time someone who identifies with the FSP says a dumb thing / takes a dumb political stance/ does a dumb thing >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @jeremykauffman
that hurts the FSP, and so perhaps instead of saying "Travis, does it really make sense to criticize FSP people?" the real question is "Jeremy, does it really make sense to have lots of FSP people advertising the brand thusly?" (In fact, BOTH are valid questions)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP
1/ Most of this is what the FSP selects for beyond IQ Strongly disagree quality of movers is down - it is up, in quantity and quality
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Never argued that it's down - (a) I have no data, (b) I'd assume flat. What I'm asserting is that, post-move, the higher-quality movers tend to disassociate from the movement at a higher rate than the lower-quality movers ("evaporative cooling" c.f. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZQG9cwKbct2LtmL3p/evaporative-cooling-of-group-beliefs … )
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.