-
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
but it's still tedious I'm not OFFENDED by the thread (well, not much), but it seems like intentionally digging into mundane details as an attempt to derail / poke fun
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
"women have the right not to be raped" what chemical is this right made of? "what? no, what I'm saying is that physical autonomy is the most important -" so are rights acids or bases? "wait, what?" I'm discussing in good faith! "are - are you? ok, well, I accept that..."
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
so are rights made out of _ENERGY_ then? Is that what you're saying? My point isn't re sacredness norms. I'm perfectly happy to discuss if Jesus was a person who lived or not, if he was divine or not ... but approaching a topic at 90 degrees seems less respectful than than 180
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
It seems inherently to be mockery, and of a low fedora sort (even though you assert it's not). Did Jesus even HAVE DNA? I dunno. Doesn't matter. God can create a universe; he can create a body with no DNA, with cloned DNA, etc etc etc
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
also, I'm not convinced that DNA existed until around 1950, but that's a longer debate
7 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
morlockp: DNA didn't exist before 1950! spivononomist: DNA hasn't existed since 2012!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I actually think
@Spivonomist would say DNA didn't exist until 2012 and was retroactively written back in the sim.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
