1/
this (specifically: the distinction between CONSENT and WISDOM or perhaps UTILITY) ties into a topic that @LibertyFarmNH and I were discussing over lunch:https://twitter.com/sonyasupposedly/status/1292869094765498369 …
-
-
4/ One could take this argument off in a Kegan levels direction: maybe 3 wants to simplify things, and 5 understands that you need separate systems at separate times, for distinct purposes. But that's not the direction I want to go.
Show this thread -
5/ I was thinking more of a Claude Shannon perspective (information theory). Morality-is-legality is a 1 bit system, and is capable of cleaving the universe into two realms: good and bad.
Show this thread -
6/ morality-vs-legality is a 2-bit system, and cleaves the universe into 4 segments. Picture a venn diagram with the circles labeled "moral?" and "legal?" Four distinct regions.
Show this thread -
7/ There's a lot more nuance in policy when you have four regions. E.g. torture and a ticking atomic bomb. Legality sets incentives. If you legalize torture because of the ticking bomb scenario, you have incentivized torture at all times and places.
Show this thread -
8/ Understanding that morality != legality means that you can keep something illegal even if you want it to happen on ultra rare occasions...because the alternative is to incentivize it to happen much more often The point here is related to, but not exactly "value of hypocrisy"
Show this thread -
9/ The point is simply this: when you have multiple axises you have more distinct spaces on the map. Gimbal lock is bad because it degrades the state space (metaphor)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimbal_lock …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.