I agree with parts of this, but strongly disagree with the "for", which implies causality The boomers accumulated a fair bit of wealth because, largely, they had luck to be born (a) during the early stages of a huge post war expansion, (b) before the progs regulated away growthhttps://twitter.com/strnglft/status/1290285507427962880 …
-
-
9/ sure, but that's mostly midwits repeating advice that worked for them, not an intentional act of sabotage against their own children intended to effect wealth transfer my argument is "crap happened, and 'boomers' as a whole aren't conspiring villains" https://twitter.com/DeanBradleySFF/status/1290323631315222534 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I. E., stop with the zero-sum game crap. It's Lefty framing.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've seen some math impaired millennials blame Boomers for Social Security, Medicare, and the Great Society. They weren't even born yet for the first and were still below then voting age for the other two.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In general this seems correct, but when you look at the aggregate effect of things like - CA housing policy - Record National Debt - The fact that Social Security relies on young workers It seems like there's a lot of generational transfer of wealth going on in favor of boomers
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Boomers - inherit pragmatism and then embrace middle-class whineness. Zoomers - inherit middle-class whineness and then embrace V column radicalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.