No, because I read the details and thus never reached this inflammatory, wrong, idiot-tier conclusion.https://twitter.com/Peter_Nimitz/status/1289755531913990144 …
-
Show this thread
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Nemets
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
Nemets @Peter_NimitzReplying to @MorlockPI should know better than to trust NYT - my understanding was that the tribes will rule much of OK with oversight of the federal government. What do the ruling actually mean? https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/09/us/supreme-court-oklahoma-mcgirt-creek-nation.html … & https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/11/us/muscogee-creek-nation-oklahoma.html … pic.twitter.com/Es2J48fb5k1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
3/ here is the actual SCOTUS ruling https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-9526_9okb.pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
4/ The question before the court was "the Major Crimes Act says that, FOR PURPOSES OF THE ACT, Indians on Indian territory blah blah blah ...and so, FOR THE PURPOSES OF THAT ACT, is X location Indian territory ?" The answer is "yes, for purposes of that act". >>>
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
6/ Does this mean that state law does not apply to Indians on land X? no Does it mean that federal law does not apply to Indians on land X? no ...regular Americans on land X? no do Indian officials get to make law for Americans on land X? no property reverts back? no
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
7/ My quick skim suggests that the ruling means one thing: * if an Indian * ...on land X * ...commits one of a certain list of enumerated crimes * ...he can not be prosecuted by STATE court * ...but must instead be prosecuted by FED court * ...util / unless Congress tweaks law
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
8/ Unless you are an registered member of an Indian tribe on a certain patch of dirt in Oklahoma and go and commit a certain crime, and care a lot about whether you get tried in courthouse A or courthouse B, this case really has zero impact on your life
3 replies 2 retweets 10 likesShow this thread
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Elam Bend
9/ Libertarians have fun with the phrase "the dog gave the cop permission to search the car". I'd rather get permission from a dog than information from a journalist.https://twitter.com/ElamBend/status/1289980908452188160 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
-
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Azathoth Liberation Front
10/ Exactly. It's 2020. If you are even halfway awake, you've know for 40 years that the media is an outhouse fire on Ebola Appreciation Day. Even normies have known this for 10 years now.https://twitter.com/TristanSevers/status/1289981719529938945 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
0 replies 3 retweets 18 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.