No, because I read the details and thus never reached this inflammatory, wrong, idiot-tier conclusion.https://twitter.com/Peter_Nimitz/status/1289755531913990144 …
-
-
6/ Does this mean that state law does not apply to Indians on land X? no Does it mean that federal law does not apply to Indians on land X? no ...regular Americans on land X? no do Indian officials get to make law for Americans on land X? no property reverts back? no
Show this thread -
7/ My quick skim suggests that the ruling means one thing: * if an Indian * ...on land X * ...commits one of a certain list of enumerated crimes * ...he can not be prosecuted by STATE court * ...but must instead be prosecuted by FED court * ...util / unless Congress tweaks law
Show this thread -
8/ Unless you are an registered member of an Indian tribe on a certain patch of dirt in Oklahoma and go and commit a certain crime, and care a lot about whether you get tried in courthouse A or courthouse B, this case really has zero impact on your life
Show this thread -
9/ Libertarians have fun with the phrase "the dog gave the cop permission to search the car". I'd rather get permission from a dog than information from a journalist.https://twitter.com/ElamBend/status/1289980908452188160 …
Show this thread -
10/ Exactly. It's 2020. If you are even halfway awake, you've know for 40 years that the media is an outhouse fire on Ebola Appreciation Day. Even normies have known this for 10 years now.https://twitter.com/TristanSevers/status/1289981719529938945 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.