-
-
9/ No, man, you can't call it "an adulterant" but then also claim it's "fine". It's fine in the sense that you're not going to, I dunno, jail them. But it's not fine in the sense that you'll accept it as equally valid, because you just told us you don'thttps://twitter.com/thesravaka/status/1289263665170939904 …
Show this thread -
10/ If you like coffee black, great. If you like it bullet proof, that's great. Here's how I like it ---> "de gustibus non est disputandum", as reasonable people have agreed to disagree for thousands of years.https://twitter.com/MorlockP/status/1289228091408003074 …
Show this thread -
11/ Maybe, but not me. I've stood up for some left-coded foods as being delicious. I have not had these "millenial" foods because I'm not hip, don't live near hip restaurants, and mostly cook my own food.https://twitter.com/yashkaf/status/1289267027782168576 …
Show this thread -
12/ EVERY society politically codes food. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯https://twitter.com/ee_elephant/status/1289268796365012994 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
that's fair. i think i should be able to describe it as an adulterant, and you should be able to enjoy your sweeteners.
-
and, fwiw i think it's perfectly valid to criticize coffee as an adulteration of water. it's not particularly good for me, and water tastes good without it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
> One man's "adulterant" is another man's "ingredient".pic.twitter.com/ftD2mlIam1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.