hell yeah I found the 1963 paper (misread as 1936 originally)
-
Show this thread
-
2 replies 3 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 1 retweet 33 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 1 retweet 30 likesShow this thread -
the paper goes on to suggest that it's important the urine not be distilled
1 reply 0 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
1 reply 0 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
-
I am not going to be as thorough as these guys
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
the cool thing is that they used male urine samples as well as non-pregnant female samples so it should work as a control to use
@eigenrobot's if he's willing to pee on some barley every morning for a few days5 replies 0 retweets 69 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @selentelechia @eigenrobot
>if he's willing to pee on some barley every morning for a few days I can speak for all men and assure you that any of us would be quite happy to pee on anything someone asked us to up to and including electric fences, once
2 replies 1 retweet 20 likes
just once? how are you going to compare and contrast DC negative and DC positive fences ?
-
-
there are two types of men those who learn and those who refuse to learn
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
My favorite quote ever is some libertarian videotaping his interactions with the police, and he turns to the camera "someone's going to learn something today, and it's not going to be me"










(cc @ngvrnd@LibertyFarmNH@mr_archenemy )1 reply 3 retweets 35 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.