2/ Not sure I follow. I also give the [ would be ] interrupter the opportunity to change their behavior...and, in fact, I strongly incentivize it. > raising one’s voice is not the solution {{citation needed}}https://twitter.com/donmexlar/status/1266473046099005441 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ One thing that has been well proven in studies is that the quicker training feedback is given, the more effective it is. This is why "clicker training" works with dogs: you can give them feedback INSTANTLY. >>>
Show this thread -
4/ When someone tries to speak over me, I don't want them to succeed at silencing me, say what they want to say, get the warm fuzzy feeling of having expressed themselves, and then get a very very small dose (PERHAPS !) of feedback 3 minutes later. >>>
Show this thread -
5/ I want them to learn INSTANTLY that their behavior is defective, does not work, does not give them the desired benefit, and DOES given them undesired repercussions. Also, "respecting the interrupter's dignity" is actively bad. It should NOT be respected.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
my method respects the interrupter’s dignity by giving them the opportunity to change their behavior; it also trains them to your standards; it is not passive aggressive but non aggressive; raising one’s voice is not the solution
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One of the most obnoxious of the soy-induced traits.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It works *extremely* well in meetings when my next sentence would've answered the thing they interrupted me to question. Significantly because by the third time, once it's become clear that's invariably the case, everybody else in the meeting is about ready to murder them.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.