I'm trying to unpack my reaction to this painting, which is strong, nonironic appreciation, despite also thinking the instruments are hilarious and, indeed, ridiculous in the setting. (2/)
-
Show this thread
-
Let's take a painter who I also love, Lawrence Alma Tadema, who painted superficially similar scenes. Here's his painting, "Phidias Showing the Frieze of the Parthenon to His Friends", which, I am delighted to say, was painted in the same year as the Moore above, 1868. (3/)pic.twitter.com/2uKif2MXzm
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Alma Tadama had a flair for drama and composition, but he was also very concerned with historicity and verisimilitude. We're seeing above a very, very specific scene--not one recorded (afaik), but one that probably happened, and that we could date to within a month. (4/)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Alma Tadama had, as I recall, a huge library of photographs of archeological stuff he drew from for his paintings. Note also that the Parthenon frieze is painted, which was a new, and controversial, piece of information at the time. (5/)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Given his intentions, then--to create a dramatic but realistic scene depicting classical moments as they might have actually appeared--if he had somehow accidentally painted a modern cello into a painting, it would be a terrible error and weakness. (6/)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
The Moore looks superficially similar, but is just not concerned with any of this. If Alma Tadema paints a toga, he's saying something about a time, style of dress, and social class of the wearer; if Moore paints a toga, he is trying his best to take us to no-time, no-place (7/)pic.twitter.com/7XiSvEOXw4
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
He was an aesthetic painter, for one, and his work is in a sense abstract--concerned with color, pattern, and rhythm rather than narrative or historicity. (8/)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
But more, and what I like so much about this painting, is that it's an ekphrastic piece. His spacing of figures & still life elements, and their repetition--the instruments, and the fact one musician appears to be cloned--is intended to itself suggest the elements of music. (9/)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
(Actually, looking again, there are two pairs of clonal musicians. That's not because he was short on individual models, I promise you) (10/)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Anyway, my thesis: The anachronistic stringed instruments are legitimately funny/ridiculous, if we think of this as a literal scene, but if we're actually evaluating the piece, it should be done as: A ) decorative painting, and B ) an attempt to emulate music in painting (11/11)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP
You're welcome! Still doing my keytar painting though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kendrictonn1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.