2/ You can tell that this is intentional, because even as heavy handed as they are in framing the story, narrative STILL cries out to reference Christies earlier, and so the elliptical "an international auction house" or "auction house" is used in pars 3, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ Hobby Lobby did nothing wrong, but is named in the headline, and then 7 more times across 20 paragraphs. Christies, which conspired with the crooked dealer, is named 0 times in those same 20 paragraphs. Curious.
Show this thread -
4/ So also: how can the NYT not have overlapping interests w the elites of Christies? Same social circles, overlapping marriages, etc. NYT smearing Hobby Lobby was prob both a drive-by of a class enemy AND a cover-up for class allies.https://twitter.com/selentelechia/status/1262977902926151681?s=19 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Color me surprised.
So very typical of the TimesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Journalist" purge when?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The cynic in me can understand why a reporter might want to do this… I have a LOT more questions about why an editor would allow this Basically you are admitting in paragraph 21 that the previous focus of your entire article is wrong and that you have smeared innocent folks..?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.