29/ It offends the same kind of people who get itchy re fiat currency or the "time debt transformation" where - as the objection says - banks pretend that money loaned out for 20 years is still usable now.
-
-
40/ This is a mistake baby libertarians make all the time. They take an already-simplified history of a thing, simplify it further, deduce a Platonic Form, and then assert that that Form is (a) real, (b) the ONLY real option. Property is to some degree a social construct.
Show this thread -
41/ In the end, force / power is real. Property is a set of norms that decrease the need to actively use force. Decreasing actual use of force is good, because violence destroys utility.
Show this thread -
42/ Yes. I like to look at things through an information technology lens. Labor levees, taxes based on arable land - all of these are good technology when computation and record keeping are expensive.https://twitter.com/random_eddie/status/1257333384096948226 …
Show this thread -
43/ On those rare occasions when I get optimistic about the future of individual liberty, it is because technological improvements make it easier and cheaper measure use and to charge people by use, not by headcount or income or land.
Show this thread -
44/ now I'm in that position where I argued for X, someone enthusiastically agreed with me re X, and now I feel dirty and need to somehow find a caveat so that I can pick a fight to ensure that I don't have any allies on this pointhttps://twitter.com/wraithburn/status/1257333895630147585 …
Show this thread -
45/ Yes. I was already thinking of property rights and making an analogy to Robert Nozick's argument in Anarchy State and Utopia, and this thread crystallizes it.https://twitter.com/thepiclord/status/1257345406503092228 …
Show this thread -
46/ very well said people trade things, and that makes clean, tidy, top-down "seeing like a state and/or autist" models untenable
Show this thread -
-
48/ I'm guessing that there aren't a ton of updates
https://twitter.com/TheClarksTale/status/1257402912600461312 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly! It frustrates me that people assume property rights are natural rights. They can't be, they don't attach to a person. The concept of property is defined by _Society_ and only makes sense within the social space. Any property rights must dwell within the social sphere.
-
What then is the difference between “this book/library is mine” vs “this dirt/land is mine”? (Am looking for a likely nuance I’m overlooking.)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.