If I remember correctly... Historically, much effort was expended on extending complex numbers. Turns out 3D didn't play well with the algebraic properties expected. However, 4D Quaternions do work.
-
-
-
I realise this doesn't really answer your question, but it is why the answer to your question doesn't really exist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Kinda depends on what you mean by 'numbers'. If you require that the number system is a field (ie. properties you'd expect of numbers, plus/including inverses for all nonzero a, and ab=ba), then it can't be done (for any odd-numbered dimension): https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/138304/an-application-of-the-multiplicativity-of-degree-extensions …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Next is quaternions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dunno from numbers, but I can juggle. Not as a nun, though.pic.twitter.com/O13337g64k
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.