It is tho. Criticism from anonymity is a good thing. The Founding Fathers criticized the British government via anonymous letters. Criticism stands or falls on the content of the criticism.https://twitter.com/bethanyshondark/status/1255108248442732550 …
-
-
6/ Eh. The attacks on me led to boycotts of my firms, which hurt me severely. So be it. I'd rather suffer the slings and arrows of fortune than try to restrict the freedom of people to speak their minds. https://twitter.com/FilosofoAnonima/status/1255153392764280832 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
7/ I really hate this "so you're saying" rhetorical technique. me: I like apples rando: so you're saying you're in favor of murdering people who like oranges? https://twitter.com/FilosofoAnonima/status/1255162430163955714 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
8/ I doubt if people, like @FilosofoAnonima , who use this technique realize how dumb it makes them. Your inability to discriminate between two things, if genuine, or your willfull conflation of two distinct things doesn't make ME look dumb.
Show this thread -
9/ Let's review what this thread is about. It started with
@bethanyshondark getting upset that person X might criticize person Y, while being anonymous. I defended anonymity, and criticism from behind the shield of anonymity. Even if it hurts the reputation or finances of Y.Show this thread -
10/ And @FilosofoAnonima responds "So you are in favor, then of decriminalizing fraud?" It takes either a strong desire to characterize or poor reading comprehension to deduce "fraud is good" from "anonymity is fine". Sad.
Show this thread -
11/ The topic was anonmity. Go back and read the thread, starting at post #1. You then conflated anonymity with fraud. Now you're conflating both of those with slander. There are three entirely distinct topics. https://twitter.com/FilosofoAnonima/status/1255164964983185409 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
12/ The topic was never "slander". Pay attention and stop using your own poor reading comprehension and confusion as proof that others are arguing in favor of either slander or fraud. https://twitter.com/FilosofoAnonima/status/1255205390087790593 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
13/ The topic was never "false speech". Scroll back through this entire thread and point to where anyone even once said "false". https://twitter.com/FilosofoAnonima/status/1255205919694237696 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
14/ I know you didn't. I did. You chose to tag into a thread that was about anonymity and attack me because, in your mind, somehow, I was arguing in favor of slander. Go through the thread. Show me where I said what you think I said. Take your time. https://twitter.com/FilosofoAnonima/status/1255206312855719936 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
15/ You're still making stuff up. I never gave "shitty advice" that "false speech was good". I challenge you for the fifth time to cite anything I ACTUALLY said in defense of your claims. https://twitter.com/FilosofoAnonima/status/1255207316653248515 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
16/ Agreed. Anonymity frees people from fear and has the potential to elicit truth.https://twitter.com/tigerboy74u/status/1255206826368397312 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.