1) yes 2) ...but all systems of governance necessarily depends on force and coercion, if you peel back enough layershttps://twitter.com/KKWuckert/status/1252247217265664012 …
-
Show this thread
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Karl K. Wuckert
2/ That's not a system - that's a hope. 10,000 years of civilization show us that a decent percent of people will not operate according to that hope. When they do not, any system of governance (state, David Friedman private law system, etc.) uses forcehttps://twitter.com/KKWuckert/status/1252259638659203079 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
5 replies 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Karl K. Wuckert
3/ You've moved the goal posts from "systems based on force...are ridiculous" to "LEGITIMATE force is not being questioned". This is kind of a "no true Scotsman" argument. "Force I like is good/ is not force, it's the force I dislike that's ridiculous"https://twitter.com/KKWuckert/status/1252300834404274177 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
Karl K. Wuckert @KKWuckertReplying to @VidyaDragon @MorlockPLegitimate force in defense of one's property is not being questioned. Due to the involuntary act of being created one is subject to the will of their creator whether justified or not. Peaceful parenting is an effort to be as fair as possible with something you created.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
4/ and, sure, if you want to make a purely tautological argument like "bad force is bad, good force is good, that's why I'm against bad force and in favor of good force", uh, feel free ... but that's the most basic / boring level of libertarianism there is. (me, 25 yrs ago)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.