2/ "Banning porn" may be your GOAL, but that's not the POLICY. The POLICY is "no encrypted web traffic, warrants sworn out to search computers and tablets based on rumors, go to jail for taking a sexy time photo with your wife, etc". https://twitter.com/RolfWahrheit/status/1234823706041606145 …
I'm not sure your goal in this conversation. I've explained it's a very very bad idea, and you want to argue, "no, actually, I've got gasoline ... well, OK, I don't have it yet, but I could get it with just a few changes". And then you're showing me tweets to support that? >>>
-
-
ok great but...you DO understand the fact that this has nothing to do with my argument, I don't care about this topic, and my argument is deeply sufficient to explain why we should not do this even if we could, yes?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think this is the non central fallacy - we already have laws that make it illegal to kill people and eat them, therefore there's no implementation problem AT ALL with banning meat eating (1 meat type down, 10 more to go) these laws work, to the degree that they do, bc >>>
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.