This is where I differ from @VarangianSkull . A minority of people: young, attractive women - are gifted with a HUGE amount of unearned "privilege" (for want of a better word). At some point they lose it and become mere mortals.
Why should I weep for a "fair" Gini coefficient? https://twitter.com/VarangianSkull/status/1225454915956432896 …
-
-
The high estimates for women have always been false on their face, if 90%+ of women survived to have children after being defeated in tribal warfare, beauty standards wouldn't be anywhere near as cross-culturally convergent as they are.
-
I also have a bone to pick with some of the ancient DNA inferences of absolute extermination as norm though-- we know there were far-ranging trade networks between stone age nomads, and we don't have the resolution to distinguish that from norm of diffusion of enslaved survivors.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting, thanks. Puts your original claim in context. ... namely: arguably but not yet conclusively, during ancestral times (but not yet known precisely when), most women reproduced and most men did not. Seems plausible. Clearly not the case today, but the pressure shows.
-
> clearly not the case today {{ citation needed }}
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
