1/ This is hilarious. A journalist has a HUGE SCOOP, GUIZEE!!1!! ...except she didn't bother to read the caucus manual. Note that these "errors" she found...cause the total number of delegates assigned to candidates to...match the total number of delegates per precinct. https://twitter.com/LuluFriesdat/status/1225256764649680898 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Jason Jones 〔emojis not found〕
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted Lulu Friesdat
3/
She deleted her original tweet, but has doubled down on her #RoundingErrors mantra.
No, this is still incorrect.
If you map (large) X voters to (small) Y delegates, you are going to get fractions left over in the vast majority of cases. >>>https://twitter.com/LuluFriesdat/status/1225272782835142656 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
Lulu Friesdat @LuluFriesdat
I tried to contact the IDP all day for an explanation. They're not answering the phone & the caucus guide is not available. I'll update our site w/ this info, but the math is problematic. Extra delegates are there because you're dividing by total caucus members, not final voters. https://twitter.com/don_quickoats/status/1225264573839749120 …
4:44 AM - 6 Feb 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.